Do You Know How to Read Nutrition Labels?

I spoke to a group of parents and children on how to read nutrition labels this weekend and decided it will be good to blog about this for a larger audience. From my experience, even among the educated, ‘Nutrition Literacy’ is far from where it should be and learning to read nutrition labels can be a good starting point.Most of us walk into a grocery store and add items to our basket, blissfully unaware of what nutrition it actually delivers. In fact, many of us hardly ever stop to read the label and even if we do get around to looking at it, we may not be sure what the numbers imply. So here are some pointers which will help you decide if the product falls in the “healthy or not so healthy category” and how often you or your child should consume it.”No Label Don’t Buy ” -check for nutrition label on the food pack you buy. Today, all food manufacturers in the country have to declare the following on a label -nutritional facts per 100 g or 100 ml or per serving of the product:energy value in kcal,
total carbohydrate and sugar,
the amount of protein,
fat in gram (g) or ml, and
vitamins and minerals for which a health claim is made”Match Nutrition information to the quantity you eat”- next check if the nutrition information is given per 100 g or per serving.Net weight grams = grams declared on the nutrition label – the package is a one serve pack, say net weight is 30g and the nutrition label gives information for a serving size, then the numbers you see on the label is the nutrition you get from the pack.Net weight (g or ml) > grams/ml declared on the nutrition label – a good example for this is the fruit drinks/juices segment – nutrition facts are often shown per 100 ml even when a typical serve size is 200 ml. So if you are not alert to this fact, you might assume that your child is consuming only half the calories /sugar!Net weight (g) < grams on nutrition label- The single serve snack packs which we buy frequently for children weigh approximately 30 g while nutrition information is given for 100 g, so we need to do some simple division here else you might be left wondering how a small packet can deliver so many calories!”Stay away from large snack packs” – they weigh more than 100 g, but present nutrition information for 100 g. Unfortunately, current labeling norms do not mandate serving size, and even if they did when was the last time you were able to convince your child to close the packet after eating 15 chips? So, it is wiser to stick to the single serve /smaller packs!”Deciphering the calories further”: What is declared on the pack is the total calories you get from the product. To arrive at the number of calories from fat multiply the amount of fat, given in grams by 9, for carbohydrates and proteins, multiply by 4.”Sugar watch”: The number declared against carbohydrates indicates ‘total carbohydrates’ which includes complex carbohydrates (like what is found in cereals), simple sugars as found in fruit, milk and cane sugar and fibre. Check if the product contains added sugar. Some responsible fruit beverage companies do differentiate between the added sugar and the sugar coming from the fruit but many do not. So, if you are not able to figure out, take a look at the ingredient list on the pack – if the ingredient list includes ‘sugar’ in addition to water and juice concentrate, you can be certain that sugar has been added to make the product.”Fat Facts”: There are good fats and bad fats. But in our country, companies are not required to provide a break-up of the fat in foods unless they make health claims like ‘low fat,’ ‘low cholesterol’. As a result, one can never be sure of the type of fat used in the packaged food. One way to find out is to look at the ingredient list for words like ‘partially hydrogenated fat’ ‘shortening,’ as these products have a higher proportion of bad fats (trans fat). In the absence of any of the above information it might be best to avoid products which are high in fat content.Trust you find these pointers useful. Next time when you go to the grocery store, do look for the nutrition label and ingredient list on pack. If you are not happy with the information given, or after doing the math realise this should not be in your basket, put it right back on the shelf and do yourself and your kids a favour!

http://parentedge.in/blog/

Online Personal Loans With Bad Credit: 3 Online Loan Risks Worth Taking

Low credit scores can play havoc with loan applications, but there is no reason to believe it impossible to secure a personal loan with bad credit. In fact, there are plenty of options available to bad credit borrowers. The only question is which of them is the best option given their specific financial situation.It is always preferable to get a loan with a low monthly repayment, but approval usually means accepting compromises and loan terms that are less than ideal. In many cases, they are high-risk online loans, where the pressure to meet repayments is high, while for lenders, the chances of getting their money back is low.The latter usually means higher interest rates are charged, making the personal loan less affordable. However, it is important to weigh up the pros and cons involved first. Here are just 3 of the most common options available.1. Fast Access Payday LoansA high-risk loan, this option nonetheless provides a high degree of approval certainty. In fact, it is rare to be so confident of getting a personal loan with bad credit without any collateral provided. However, there are compromises to accept.First of all, the loan limit is quite low with most lenders offering a maximum $1,500. Given that approval can be is granted within minutes, and deposited into the account of the borrower within a few hours, it is ideal in dealing with financial emergencies. But it is the terms of repayment that make them high-risk online loans.Granted against an upcoming paycheck, interest rates are still extremely high (up to 30%) and the repayment term is extremely short (14-30 days). This personal loan is repaid in full directly from the paycheck, leaving little over to meet normal monthly expenses with – a $1,500 loan could require a single repayment of $1,950, for example.2. Person 2 Person (P2P) LoansThis is one of the most progressive loan options available online, and one that has its positives and negatives. When seeking a personal loan with bad credit, it offers affordable access to required funds without having to worry about the influence of bad credit scores over the interest rate and terms.These online sites connect individuals rather than applicants with lending institutions. The required sum and repayment limit are advertised by the borrower, and those individuals who are willing to invest in the loan can do so. Considered high-risk online loans for lenders, it is little more than a leap of faith with no recourse should the borrower default.For example, if $4,000 is needed but your monthly repayments budget is $150, then four individuals may invest $1,000 each. When the loan is repaid after 3 years, they will each have earned back $1,350 – that is $1,400 over the borrowed sum, much more than a personal loan from a traditional lender.3. Cosigner LoansA third option is a cosigner loan, which is arguably the most affordable option when seeking a personal loan with bad credit. The interest rate is kept low by a cosigner, who guarantees the monthly repayments will be made without fail. This means the degree of risk a lender faces is effectively removed, and because of this a low interest rate is charged.However, this option can be considered a high-risk online loan by the cosigner since they have promised to take full responsibility should the borrower be unable to make the payments.They must be subjected to a credit check, with lenders needing to know if they have a good credit history and ample income. If they pass scrutiny, approval of the personal loan is practically guaranteed.
jasabacklinkpro.infojasabacklinks.infokalipakem.com

What We Have Here Is A Failure To Communicate

The results of this past election proved once again that the Democrats had a golden opportunity to capitalize on the failings of the Trump Presidency but, fell short of a nation wide mandate. A mandate to seize the gauntlet of the progressive movement that Senator Sanders through down a little over four years ago. The opportunities were there from the very beginning even before this pandemic struck. In their failing to educate the public of the consequences of continued Congressional gridlock, conservatism, and what National Economic Reform’s Ten Articles of Confederation would do led to the results that are playing out today.. More Congressional gridlock, more conservatism and more suffering of millions of Americans are the direct consequences of the Democrats failure to communicate and educate the public. Educate the public that a progressive agenda is necessary to pull the United States out of this Pandemic, and restore this nations health and vitality.

It was the DNC’s intent in this election to only focus on the Trump Administration. They failed to grasp the urgency of the times. They also failed to communicate with the public about the dire conditions millions have been and still are facing even before the Pandemic. The billions of dollars funneled into campaign coffers should have been used to educate the voting public that creating a unified coalition would bring sweeping reforms that are so desperately needed. The reality of what transpired in a year and a half of political campaigning those billions of dollars only created more animosity and division polarizing one extreme over another.

One can remember back in 1992 Ross Perot used his own funds to go on national TV to educate the public on the dire ramifications of not addressing our national debt. That same approach should have been used during this election cycle. By using the medium of television to communicate and educate the public is the most effective way in communicating and educating the public. Had the Biden campaign and the DNC used their resources in this way the results we ae seeing today would have not created the potential for more gridlock in our government. The opportunity was there to educate the public of safety protocols during the siege of this pandemic and how National Economic Reform’s Ten Articles of Confederation provides the necessary progressive reforms that will propel the United States out of the abyss of debt and restore our economy. Restoring our economy so that every American will have the means and the availability of financial and economic security.

The failure of the Democratic party since 2016 has been recruiting a Presidential Candidate who many felt was questionable and more conservative signals that the results of today has not met with the desired results the Democratic party wanted. Then again? By not fully communicating and not educating the public on the merits of a unified progressive platform has left the United States transfixed in our greatest divides since the Civil War. This writers support of Senator Bernie Sanders is well documented. Since 2015 he has laid the groundwork for progressive reforms. He also has the foundations on which these reforms can deliver the goods as they say. But, what did the DNC do, they purposely went out of their way to engineer a candidate who was more in tune with the status-quo of the DNC. They failed to communicate to the public in educating all of us on the ways our lives would be better served with a progressive agenda that was the benchmark of Senators Sanders Presidential campaign and his Our Revolution movement. And this is way there is still really no progress in creating a less toxic environment in Washington and around the country.